For organizations with key-person risk

The software runs the business.
But every important answer still comes from a person.

A few senior engineers have become the bottleneck for every architectural decision. Harmony makes the system understandable without chasing them down.

See it on a real codebase — no setup required.

See a sample report

Lower key-person risk

When a senior engineer leaves, the architectural understanding doesn’t leave with them.

Self-serve clarity

Product, ops, and finance can read the brief and ask follow-ups without booking time with the architects.

Always current

Re-run against the latest commit. The picture stays in sync with the code, not with someone’s memory.

Who this is for

For leaders who can’t afford to depend on a handful of senior engineers for every answer.

New CTOs / VPs of Engineering

You inherited a complex system and are accountable for it. You need a defensible picture before making big calls.

Founders & early CEOs

Your team built it. You're accountable for it. You need to understand it without slowing them down.

M&A and acquisition teams

You're evaluating a target and need to know what you're buying — and what changing it will cost.

PE & VC operating partners

You need a fast, defensible technical read on a portfolio company — without booking weeks of interviews.

Product & business leaders

You need a board-ready view of the system without becoming the technical translator.

Engineering leaders planning a migration

You're weighing rewrite vs. refactor and need to see the blast radius before you commit.

From tribal knowledge to durable understanding

1

Point at the system

Connect the repositories that actually run the business. We pull the structure straight from source.

2

Codify the structure

Boundaries, dependencies, data flows, and complexity hotspots — written down once, available to everyone.

3

Ask without escalating

Use the chat surface to interrogate the system. Senior engineers stay focused on shipping.

Common questions

Do you train on our code?

No. Code is processed for analysis only and is never used to train models.

What do we need to share to get started?

A repository — GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps are all supported. Zipped sources work too.

How fast do we see something useful?

First brief lands in days, not quarters. Most teams have a board-ready view within 48 hours of connecting a repo.

The system should explain itself.

First briefing in 48 hours. See your codebase explained end-to-end without scheduling a single architect.

SOC 2 alignedNot used for trainingBriefings for teams navigating systems they didn't build